Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Connections certainly one of mate character characteristic resemblance, relationship beginning, relationships quality, and you can like. [ Hyperlinks ]
Baxter, L. A great., & West, L. (2003). Partners perceptions of their similarities and you can variations: A dialectical direction. Record of Individual and you can Societal Matchmaking, 20, 491-514. [ Website links ]
Berscheid, Elizabeth. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and you can feeling. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and in conflict matchmaking (pp. 143-161). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, Elizabeth., & Walster, G. W. (1971). Real appeal and relationship choices: A test of your matching theory. Journal from Experimental Social Mindset, eight, 173-189. [ Hyperlinks ]
Diary out of Social and private Relationships, 24, 479-496
Berscheid, Elizabeth., & Regan, P. (2005). Brand new mindset away from social relationships. Upper Seat Lake, NJ: Pearson Knowledge (Prentice Hallway). [ Website links ]
Berger, C. R. (1975). Activity results and you may attributional communication just like the determinants out-of social destination. Message Monographs, forty, 280-286. [ Hyperlinks ]
Berscheid, Age., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Interest and you can personal relationships. When you look at the D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & Grams. Lindzey (Eds.), Brand new handbook off societal mindset (Vol. dos, last ed. Pp. 193-281). Ny: McGraw-Mountain. [ Website links ]
Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. Roentgen., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2004, Will get 11). U.S. Patent 6,735,568. Arizona, DC. [ Hyperlinks ]
Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2008, Late. 18). You.S. Patent eight,454,357B2. Arizona, DC. [ Links ]
Buss, D. M. (1984). Relationship diversity getting personality dispositions: Evaluation which have around three more investigation provide. Decisions Genetics, 14, 111-123. [ Website links ]
Byrne, D., & Rhamey, Roentgen. (1965). Magnitude out of positive and negative reinforcements since an excellent determinant regarding interest. Diary out-of Personality and Personal Mindset, dos, 884-889. [ Backlinks ]
Carter, S. R. (2005, Feb.), To possess progressive-day Cupids, investigation replaces dating: Mental science are behind the brand new effective matches produced in the eHarmony. Connection getting Emotional Science Observer, 18. Installed regarding [ Hyperlinks ]
Carter, S. R., & Buckwalter, J. G. (2009). Improving partner possibilities through the internet: An assessment of relationships high quality between marriages due to an online dating system and you may marriages arising from unfettered options. Interpersona: A major international Journal into Personal Relationship, step three, 105-125. [ Hyperlinks ]
Carter, S., & Snow, C. (2004, May). Helping men and women go into most useful marriages playing with predictive varieties of relationship achievement. Paper presented at 16th Annual Meeting of the American Emotional People. [ Backlinks ]
Approach and you may program to possess determining people who find themselves browsing possess a flourishing relationship
C). How does personality matter from inside the ination out-of characteristic anxiety, negativity, and you can relationship satisfaction. Journal regarding Identity and you can Public Mindset, 78, 326-336. [ Backlinks ]
Clark, M. S. (1985). Effects of matchmaking kind of getting information being compatible. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you can in conflict relationship (pp. 119-140). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Coombs, R. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex variations in relationship aspiration and you will pleasure with computer system-created partners. Journal regarding ily, twenty eight, 62-66. [ Website links ]
Cooper, A good., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Love in cyberspace: Facts on line attraction. Record from Sex Training and you may Procedures, twenty-two, 7-fourteen. [ Website links ]
Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Create anybody know very well what they need: An identical or complementary mate? Evolutionary Therapy, six, 595-602. [ Hyperlinks ]
Feingold Armenisk dating-app android, An effective. (1988). Complimentary for elegance during the intimate couples and you can same-sex family members: An effective meta-data and you will theoretic criticism. Mental Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Links ]
Felmlee, D. H. (2001). From appealing to appalling: Disenchantment having a romantic mate. Sociological Perspectives, forty two, 263-280. [ Hyperlinks ]
